Mesothelioma Attorneys
Workers’ disease meeting
|
|
A DEDICATED group of campaigners is fighting for the rights of victims of mesothelioma, better known as asbestos disease. There are around 1,800 cases of the illness reported in Britain each year. This number is growing and will not peak for several years, because the disease develops at least 10 years after exposure to asbestos and sometimes as long as 40 or even 50 years after exposure. The Cheshire Asbestos Victims Support group, based in Runcorn, has been supporting victims of asbestos disease and their families since 1992. The not-for-profit support organisation is staffed by volunteers, most of whom are victims of asbestos disease themselves. The group owns a respite care caravan in Rhyl, North Wales, where sufferers and their families are able to have respite holidays at the group’s five star caravan bought in 1999 with charitable donations. Source : iccheshireonline.icnetwork.co.uk |
Related Articles from Attorney for Mesothelioma
Breakthrough on asbestos disease
Doctors are developing the first ever effective treatment for the respiratory disease mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a disease of the lung lining and chest wall contracted from exposure to asbestos. It is responsible for as many deaths as cervical cancer. The disease has traditionally viewed as untreatable and incurable, but speakers at the British Thoracic Society (BTS) summer meeting in Southampton on Thursday will outline medical and surgical advances that suggest otherwise. They will highlight recent trials which show that chemotherapy treatment improves the symptoms of mesothelioma, while a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery can produce prolonged survival, if the
ACTU calls on Govt to phase out importation of asbestos
On the same day that a South Australian woman has received a record payout for pain and suffering from an asbestos-related disease, a meeting of the Federal and State Workplace Relations Ministers in Melbourne agreed to yet more time-consuming consultation on phasing out the importation of the deadly substances. This follows last week's snap maritime union ban on handling asbestos, an action which seriously threatens production at Australia's biggest brake lining plant, situated in western Victoria. On this program a decade ago, the same manufacturer, Bendix Mintex, declared its intention to find an alternative to the asbestos used in its brake linings. Despite
Asbestos law plans backed by MSPs
The Scottish Executive introduced new measures in December to end the dilemma facing mesothelioma victims. They were forced to choose between claiming damages for themselves or waiting so that relatives could possibly claim more after their death. The Holyrood committee scrutinising the bill recommended that MSPs back it when it goes before parliament. Sufferers have been able to lodge compensation claims since 20 December even though the Mesothelioma Damages Bill is not yet law. In an unprecedented move, Deputy Justice Minister Johann Lamont announced at the committee's meeting on 13 December that the bill would be amended to enable sufferers
Texas high court says asbestos plaintiffs can sue more than once
COPYRIGHT 2001 Association of Trial Lawyers of America A recent ruling by the Texas Supreme Court will give many workers in that state who have suffered debilitating asbestos-related injuries more than one chance to seek recovery in court. Carving out a narrow exception to the statute of limitations and the single-action rule, the court concluded that a person who files suit or settles a claim for a nonmalignant asbestos-related condition is not prohibited from filing suit to recover damages for a later-discovered malignant disease. (Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp., No. 98-1128, 2000 WL 1753648 (Tex. Nov. 30, 2000).) "At least in
Texas high court says asbestos plaintiffs can sue more than once
COPYRIGHT 2001 Association of Trial Lawyers of America A recent ruling by the Texas Supreme Court will give many workers in that state who have suffered debilitating asbestos-related injuries more than one chance to seek recovery in court. Carving out a narrow exception to the statute of limitations and the single-action rule, the court concluded that a person who files suit or settles a claim for a nonmalignant asbestos-related condition is not prohibited from filing suit to recover damages for a later-discovered malignant disease. (Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp., No. 98-1128, 2000 WL 1753648 (Tex. Nov. 30, 2000).) "At least in